New · Sayvant Reflect

Find the documentation gaps your audits miss.

Documentation drives clinical outcomes, defensibility, and reimbursement. Sayvant Reflect analyzes every chart and turns findings into prescriptive feedback.

The audit gap

Today's audit workflow has blind spots.

RCM, UM, and provider education each catch a slice of documentation quality. None of them, alone or together, reach the full chart volume your group generates every day.

RCM

Reporting limited to aggregated pro-fee code distribution, with queries limited to the bottom 5 percentile of charts.

Utilization Management

UM-driven reviews focus on level of admission and diagnosis specificity, with limited prescriptive coaching.

Provider Education

Peer-to-peer coaching is time consuming, costly, and capped at <2% of total encounters per year.

Result: you struggle to identify documentation improvement opportunities across the group, and initiatives are limited to a single focus area each month (e.g. SEP-1 compliance). Personalized review and coaching is prohibitively expensive to scale.
What Sayvant Reflect analyzes

Three layers of analysis on every chart.

Sayvant Reflect performs retrospective analysis on every chart, scoring against thousands of physician-validated clinical criteria specific to acute care.

01

Clinical Quality

Measure documentation defensibility against standards of care. Covers diagnosis specificity, defensibility of plans, can't-miss differentials, and adherence to society guidelines for high-risk presentations.

02

Professional Fee Capture

Understand if documentation accurately reflects the complexity of care delivered. Covers critical care eligibility, advanced care planning, independent historian, and interpretation codes.

03

Level of Admission

Analyze appropriateness and justification of admission level (inpatient vs. observation), based on hospital system disease definitions and payer criteria.

How it works

Analyze 100% of your group's encounters.

Submit chart records via direct integration, flat files, or PDFs. Sayvant Reflect returns structured analysis on clinical quality, fee capture, and admission level for every encounter, in near real time.

Personalized Recommendations

Prescriptive feedback on every clinician's encounters, benchmarked against peers. Review specific notes in detail and flag common documentation patterns.

Aggregated Reporting

Documentation patterns and improvement opportunities across the group. Identify clinicians in need of coaching and track change over time.

Pulse Checks

Increase coverage from <2% today to 100% of charts, at a fraction of the $50 per chart manual audit cost. Identify gaps in real time.

Results from real groups

Sayvant Reflect surfaces patterns medical directors can act on.

Coaching that's targeted, measurable, and tied to documentation quality the same week the encounter happened.

RCM · Critical Care
+40%
critical care capture

Identified systemic under-identification of critical care by APPs at a Level 2 Trauma Center. Trends surfaced to medical directors, corrected via coaching, and built into Sayvant generation.

Quality · DDx
20%
of charts had gaps

Identified insufficient consideration of landmine differential diagnoses for chest pain, dizziness, and back pain chief complaints in 20% of encounters at a FSED.

Risk · Malpractice
+16%
defensibility improvement

Identified common Medical Decisionmaking gaps in cases that went to suit, driving a 16% improvement in defensibility as rated by a panel of medical malpractice experts (MDs).

Built on SQS

The Sayvant Quality System, applied retrospectively.

Learn more about SQS →

Reflect uses the same physician-validated quality scoring engine that powers Sayvant chart generation: 1M+ acute care encounters, 300+ rule-based checks, three proprietary indexes for clinical quality, fee capture, and defensibility.

HIPAASOC 2 Type IIUS data residency